Tightening government procurement

The BBC carries an article that is both encouraging yet disappointing in equal measure.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25884915
The article identifies 2 points.

1. The government's CPO identifies appalling behaviour by IT suppliers.
2. The government limits IT contracts.

Never has the phrase "caveat emptor" been more appropriate. Questions and issues abound in equal measure.

The Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude said in one case a government department was charged £30,000 for changing the text on a web page.

Crothers said a supplier tried to charge £65 for a laptop power cable worth around £20


Who approved the contracts that allowed for such charging? Why were the issues not raised? How many more of these contracts are in the public vaults.

If contract sizes are to be limited then this has the potential to a) drive contracts to be competed by stealth; b) disjointed contracts that fail to achieve the outcomes; c) increased bidders costs and therefore overall increased costs.

Is now the time that the government appoints specialists and hold them accountable for successful delivery of the project outcomes detailed and approved in the business case 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contract Management - Video

How transparent are some sectors?

PPP Management - Technical Authorship